ZAK PLATFORM
Run AI-driven work safely in real-world systems.
ZAK validates, governs, and executes AI-generated actions so teams can move fast without breaking things.
Designed for teams operating in high-trust and regulated environments.
PROBLEM
AI can generate actions. It cannot safely execute them.
AI produces code, decisions, and changes quickly. The hard part is deciding what should actually run in production systems, business workflows, and regulated environments.
- Teams want AI speed, but execution risk rises the moment output touches real systems.
- Without controls, approvals, and evidence, every deployment becomes a trust exercise.
- Most teams choose between slowing down or taking on risk they cannot explain later.
WHAT_ZAK_DOES
ZAK makes execution safe
ZAK sits between AI output and real-world execution. It adds validation, approval, and a verifiable record before anything important runs.
AI suggests
A model proposes a change, action, or decision.
ZAK validates
Rules, context, and risk are checked before execution.
You approve
Humans stay in control of risky or material changes.
Execution + receipt
Approved work runs with a verifiable audit trail.
USE_CASE
Fix and review AI-generated work safely
Start with a simple wedge: AI proposes a code change. ZAK helps your team decide whether it should actually run.
- AI proposes a code change, migration, or system update.
- ZAK analyzes the request against policy, context, and execution risk.
- You review the proposal and approve what should happen.
- The change executes with a full audit trail attached to the result.
EXAMPLE_FLOW
"Update a workflow, patch a bug, or modify a deployment setting."
ZAK checks what is changing, who is affected, and what controls apply.
A reviewer sees the proposal before execution moves forward.
The approved change runs and the receipt records what happened.
Governor IDE
One product wedge: review AI-generated coding work with governed execution and auditability.
HOW_IT_WORKS
Governed execution, not just AI output
ZAK adds a lightweight execution layer around AI-generated work. It validates what is being attempted, enforces the controls you set, and records the result in a form teams can review later.
- Machine-checkable constraints evaluated deterministically.
- Authority boundaries enforced before execution.
- Outcome: allow / deny / require waiver.
Validation
Proposed actions are checked against policy, environment context, and execution risk before they touch a live system.
Governance
You decide what needs approval, what can run automatically, and what must be blocked or transformed first.
Enforcement
Execution happens in a controlled path, so the outcome is observable, reviewable, and backed by a verifiable audit trail.
PROOF_AND_DEPTH
Built for teams that need evidence, not just logs
Once the product is clear, the technical depth matters: receipts, auditability, replay, and independently verifiable records of what executed and what was denied.
Receipts
Every governed action can emit a receipt with the decision, controls, and execution outcome attached.
Replayability
Teams can reconstruct what happened during review, incident response, or external audit without stitching together screenshots and chat threads.
Cryptographic integrity
Receipts can be verified independently, so the proof is stronger than "trust our UI" or "trust our logs."
Run the demo above to generate a receipt.
—
WHY_NOW
AI is generating more work than teams can safely execute.
ZAK is the missing layer between AI output and real-world action. It lets teams move faster without losing control of approvals, enforcement, or evidence.
More generated work
AI can propose more changes than teams can safely review through ad hoc process.
More execution risk
The risk appears when output becomes deployment, admin action, or workflow change.
A missing control layer
Teams need a governed path from suggestion to execution, with proof attached.
PRICING
Start with one workflow. Expand when you need more control.
Every tier includes governed execution, receipts, and a verifiable audit trail. The difference is how much control, scale, and deployment flexibility your team needs.
For developers using AI
- Governor IDE access
- Governed execution for individual workflows
- Receipts and audit trail from day one
- Context visibility and usage controls
For teams running AI workflows
- Everything in Builder
- Team controls and shared governance
- Custom policy and approval flows
- Governance signals across more workflows
For high-trust and regulated environments
- Everything in Team
- Replay, export, and deeper audit controls
- Versioned governance and signed artifacts
- Cloud, VPC, and on-prem deployment options
ENTERPRISE_PILOT
Need a higher-trust rollout? Start with a technical pilot to measure governed execution on a real workflow before expanding.
NEXT_STEP
Put governed execution between AI output and real-world action.
Start with one workflow. Review what AI proposes, approve what should run, and keep a verifiable audit trail from day one.
Designed for teams that need speed, control, and evidence in the same system.
See the proof first. Expand into a live workflow when it fits.
Review AI-generated work with controlled execution and receipts.
Add governance, approval, and auditability before output reaches production.
Bring verifiable audit trails into regulated or business-critical workflows.
Run the proof demo and verify the evidence path yourself.